Supplier transparency
Plan to map supplier identity, material origin and relevant processing routes. Apply risk-based due diligence and retain traceable evidence for customer requirements.
Sustainability
A sustainability planning framework for our role as a metal sourcing and supply-chain business.

This roadmap describes planned actions, not verified achievements. Implementation timing and quantitative targets depend on an approved baseline, resources and management review.
Sustainability
Plan to map supplier identity, material origin and relevant processing routes. Apply risk-based due diligence and retain traceable evidence for customer requirements.
Build an organizational emissions baseline and screen relevant value-chain sources, especially purchased materials and freight. Record the method, boundary, period and data quality used.
Evaluate recycled-content evidence, material utilization and recoverable packaging where technically appropriate. Compare alternatives using equivalent performance requirements.
Include worker safety, labour practices and business ethics in supplier reviews. Establish a route to raise concerns and document the handling of corrective actions.
Assign accountability for data collection and management review. Publish progress only when the underlying records, scope and limitations can be explained.
Sustainability
| Horizon from approval | Action | Evidence of progress |
|---|---|---|
| 0–6 months | Define boundaries and responsibilities; map purchasing and transport activity; establish a first data register. | Documented baseline approach, supplier map and list of data gaps. |
| 6–18 months | Prioritize supplier due diligence; pilot product-data requests, material-efficiency actions and shipment consolidation. | Supplier evidence coverage, pilot records and consistently defined indicators. |
| 18–36 months | Review outcomes against the baseline; scale useful pilots; set quantified targets where evidence supports them. | Management-reviewed progress summary, revised action plan and clearly stated limitations. |
Sustainability
| Proposed indicator | Definition |
|---|---|
| Supplier review coverage | Share of purchasing spend covered by a documented, risk-based supplier review. |
| Product-data coverage | Share of purchased material mass with usable origin, recycled-content or product-emissions evidence; reported separately by data type. |
| Freight performance | Transport emissions and activity by mode, using consistent boundaries and tonne-kilometres where data permits. |
| Material & packaging efficiency | Track offcut recovery and reusable or recyclable packaging through agreed pilot programmes. |
Sustainability
The planned governance model assigns a management sponsor and named owners for procurement, logistics and data quality. A documented annual review would assess progress, corrective actions and priorities.
For carbon accounting, the plan draws on GHG Protocol corporate and value-chain guidance. Corporate inventories and product footprints should be reported separately and compared only with equivalent boundaries and methods.
Certification, recycled content and lower-emission claims should identify the specific supplier, product, period and supporting evidence. This roadmap does not assert current certification, carbon neutrality or achieved emissions reductions.
Methodological references
GHG Protocol — Corporate Standard GHG Protocol — Scope 3 StandardContact
Tell us the evidence your project needs so it can be considered in the material and supplier review.